Category Archives: Internationalt Nyt

UK: OPED: It Doesn’t Make Sense To Jail Drug Dealers

Media Awareness ProjectUK: OPED: It Doesn’t Make Sense To Jail Drug Dealers

29 Mar 2000 – Daily Telegraph (UK)

Author: Tom Utley

OPED: IT DOESN’T MAKE SENSE TO JAIL DRUG DEALERSMY FIRST instinct yesterday when I read Lady Runciman’s suggestion that penalties for the possession of soft drugs should be relaxed was that it sounded very sensible.

Quite a few of my friends take cannabis, and I would hate to see any of them go to prison for it. Nor do I think that they deserve to. If they are doing any harm to anybody, after all, they are harming only themselves – although they may also be upsetting their near and dear. (As it happens, I do think that those of my friends who have smoked large amounts of cannabis over a number of years have done themselves considerable harm. They become more dim-witted and boring as every year passes.

But they are grown-ups, and that is a matter for them.)

And, anyway, it now seems to have become perfectly respectable for eminent public figures, from President Clinton to Mo Mowlam, to confess to having smoked the odd joint. There may be lots of reasons why we would like to see these characters driven out of office, but hardly anybody says that their criminal use of drugs in their youth is one of them. If most people are prepared to forgive the President of the United States and the British Cabinet enforcer for having taken cannabis, then why should the law go on demanding that less important people should go to prison for the same offence?

I also felt instinctively that Lady Runciman, who chaired the independent inquiry into the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971, was right to say that the penalties for dealing in drugs should remain very stiff.

Like most of us, I am revolted by the very thought of the criminal gangs who prey upon the weaknesses of others and depend for their living on pedalling products that undoubtedly cause a great deal of misery.

Indeed, everything that Lady Runciman wrote seemed at first to have the ring of common sense.

I particularly agreed when she said: “The most dangerous message of all is the message that all drugs are equally dangerous.

When young people know that the advice they are being given is either exaggerated or untrue in relation to less harmful drugs, there is a real risk they will discount everything else they are told about the most hazardous drugs, including heroin and cocaine.” How wise she was, I thought, to recommend that possessing less harmful drugs – such as cannabis, ecstasy and LSD – should cease to be punishable by imprisonment. (No letters, please, from parents whose children have died taking LSD or ecstasy. I know that these drugs can be lethal, and I grieve for the bereaved. But there are mercifully few of them.) How wise of Lady Runciman, too, I thought, to say that those who dealt in drugs of any sort should continue to arouse the full fury of the law.

Those, as I say, were my first reactions to Lady Runciman’s report – and I suspect that a huge number of others will have felt the same. It was only when I sat down to write this article that doubts began to creep in. And the more I have thought about it, the more I have become convinced that Lady Runciman’s recommendations offer us the worst of every possible world.

In my own youth, I supported the decriminalisation of all drugs. I knew from my own very limited experience that cannabis was not half as dangerous as adults made it out to be, and I suspected that the same could be be said for most other illegal drugs.

It was not so much the drugs themselves that were addictive, I thought, as the personalities of those who took them. I knew some people who had taken quite a bit of heroin, but found it easy to give up (although others, of course, were completely ruined by it).

I was also strongly persuaded by the argument that decriminalisation would cut the crime rate, in the way that the end of Prohibition in the United States flattened the crime wave in Chicago. As long as it remained illegal to own or sell narcotics, they would be very expensive, and extremely lucrative to the criminals who sold them. People would go on burgling and mugging to pay for them, and the criminal gangs who supplied the drugs would go on attacking each other to preserve their local monopolies.

I suppose it was fatherhood that changed my mind about drugs. I knew in my heart that if there was one thing that I wanted for my children, it was that they should never become drug addicts.

I decided that everything I had believed before was mere youthful posturing.

If fear of the law helped to persuade my sons against dabbling in narcotics, then as far as I was concerned, drug-taking should remain illegal. That was how I felt until yesterday, when Lady Runciman came along with her report.

Now she has made me feel that my youthful posturing was absolutely right.

Here she is, telling my children on the one hand that it is not so very wicked to take cannabis, ecstasy or LSD (not wicked enough, anyway, to merit prison). So the law, if her recommendations are accepted, will hardly discourage them from dabbling.

On the other hand, she is telling the drug-dealers that they are very wicked indeed.

So her recommendations will do nothing to counter the “prohibition effect”. Dealing in drugs will remain a violent business for criminal gangs, drug prices will remain high and people will continue to steal to pay for them.

How, anyway, can you say that it is all right to buy something, but not all right to sell it? It just doesn’t make sense.

If it is not so very wrong to smoke cannabis, then why is it so very wrong to sell it? It would be perfectly rational to say that buying and selling it are equally wrong.

But that is not what Lady Runciman is saying.

I am now coming round to the view that narcotics are not so very different from alcohol, and that they should be treated in the same way by the law. People do terrible things under the influence of alcohol – and there must be a great many more alcoholics than drug addicts in Britain. But very few suggest that alcohol should be banned.

Most adults can drink without getting into fights or smashing up cars. Some cannot, and those are the ones who should be severely punished by the law – just as anybody who harms others while under the influence of drugs deserves to be penalised.

It is right that the sale of alcohol is regulated, and that children are protected from it. But the consumption of alcohol has been a part of civilised life since man first invented wine. Decriminalisation would be the first step towards civilising drug-taking. Perhaps the Victorians had it about right when they saw drug-taking as a vice, but accepted it as a human weakness as long as it did nobody but the drug-taker any harm. I am increasingly convinced that Lady Runciman has got it all wrong.

MAP posted-by: Greg

Transscript of radio show discussing Dutch vs US Drugs policy March 2000

Jeg har fått denne engelske oversettelsen av et TV program om Nederlandsk narkotikapolitikk som jeg sender nettverket.
bb
—–Opprinnelig melding—–
Fra: Rolf Bromme [mailto:rolf.bromme@fr.se]
Sendt: 29. mars 2000 17:21
Til: bernt.bull@avhold.no
Emne: Fwd: The failure of 25 years tolertant drugs policy in the Netherlands

Dear all,
Please find below the English translation of the TV program The failure of
25 years tolerant drugs policy in Holland sent, 12-3- 2000 by KRO-
netwerk TV-Nederland.
Renée
EURAD e-mail list
P.O. Box 139
234 23 LOMMA, Sweden
r.w@swipnet.se
website http://www.iol.ie/~eurad

Translated by Piet Huurman from:
>> Alex van Vuuren
>> Office manager
>> Schreeuw om Leven
>> Ruitersweg 35-37
>> 1211 KT Hilversum
>> Tel.: (035) 624 43 52
>> Fax: (035) 624 91 41
>> E-mail: schreeuw@solcon.nl
>> Internet: http://kerk.net/schreeuw
>>
>> Concerned Citizens/Cry for Life, The Netherlands, Hilversum; March 25
>2000
>> The failure of 25 years tolerant drugs policy in Holland
>> – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -
>> (facts and statements taken from Netherlands KRO Netwerk-TV,
>> Sunday 12-03-2000)
>> Subtitle: A cross-grained look at the Dutch drugspolicy
>>
>> Amsterdam, touristic attraction number 1, counts today 210
>> coffeeshops and 75 hash-bars, visited by a lot of tourists.
>> Holland is of opinion that it handles it drugspolicy in a mature
>> way. Scientists and officials are even proud of it.
>>
>> P.Cohen, University of Amsterdam (known as a pro-legalizer):
>> Tolerance is an excellent way of handling a problem, of which the
>> development in future is not known. It keeps people away (out)
>> of prison, and it softens public social problems.
>>
>> Network: Apart from that there are also excrescences:
>> – Holland as producer number 1 of XTC;
>> – Holland as growery of weed of excellent quality;
>> – Holland as transit port for cheap harddrugs like heroine and
>> cocaine;
>> – criminals become very wealthy of the drugtrade.
>>
>> Larry Collins (writer of books about the drugproblem):
>> I think the heart of the problem is that – let’s say – the
>> coffeeshoppolicy and the softdrugpolicy has engendered a wider
>> framework of tolerance and leniency towards other drugs, towards
>> particularly cocaine, heroine and XTC.
>>
>> Network: Last year Larry Collins portraited the Dutch drugspolicy in
>> the authoritative magazine “Foreign Affairs”.
>>
>> Larry Collins: 80 % of the heroine that we seized in the United Kingdom
>in
>> 1998,
>> either was transited via Holland or was warehoused here before
>> it arrived. 80 % of the heroine seized in France was routed down from
>> Holland. The British customs estimate that 95 % of the XTC-tablets,
>> consumed in the UK, came out of Holland, were manufactured here.
>> The French set that figure at 73,6 %. That’s why you are the
>drugscapital of
>> Western Europe.
>>
>> Network: Collin’s findings were received by Holland with anger.
>> The Dutch embassador in New York even expressed his displeasure
>> by reacting in the same magazine, as follows:
>>
>> Foreign Affairs: The article of Collins was not meant to promote a
>serious
>> debate.
>> It was a too simple polemic about a problem that deserves to be handled
>by
>> using exact information.
>>
>> Larry Collins:
>> Foreign Ministry – I was told – was just enraged and sent it out to all
>the
>> embassies saying: You must do something to stop this terrible propaganda
>> against our enlightened drugprogram.
>> So I think he was sieved by the authors in The Hague: Get a letter of
>> Foreign Affairs tomorrow.
>>
>> Network: One of the drugsinvestigators of the University of Amsterdam
>> also reacted on Foreign Affairs.
>>
>> UvA: Collins arguments are mainly exaggerated, misleading and unsound.
>>
>> Network: The name “Nederweed” is a contraction of Nederland and weed.
>> Nederweed is produced only in Holland. In every other European country
>the
>> growth of weed is forbidden. In Holland also, but here police and
>justice
>> blink facts.
>>
>> Jaap de Vlieger, chief ot the Rotterdam narcotica-brigade of the police:
>> I myself plead for: Stop that tolerance policy. It’s the most strange
>thing
>> we have, because it means that the problem is unmaneagable. We really
>should
>> stop that policy of tolerance.
>>
>> Network: And this is Rob Hessing, ex-chief commissioner of the Rotterdam
>> police. Nowadays he is a member of the Dutch Embassy in Paris, where he
>> tries to make understood the Dutch drugspolicy.
>>
>> Hessing: Tolerance: that sounds quite plausible, but it is connected
>with
>> great dangers, because at length you cannot survey what you tolerate.
>You
>> cannot at all manage the situation.
>>
>> Network: 1976: the begin of the tolerance policy. Drugsuse is no longer
>> punishable, softdrugs are obtainable in youth centra.
>> Goal: to keep youngsters, using softdrugs, away from harddrugs.
>> This policy is called: separation of markets.
>>
>> T.Blom, Erasmus University Rotterdam: Separation of markets means: you
>> tolerate the small scale dealing in softdrugs, whereas you try to
>tackle the
>> harddrugsmarket with
>> every possible juridicial means.
>>
>> Network: In 1976 minister Irene Vorrink (Labour Party) was responsible
>for
>> public health. Se is the mother of Koos Zwart, in those days a notorious
>> VARA-radioman.
>>
>> Koos Zwart: There is still an enormous atmosphere of illicity.
>> It is still a habit of several people to state that maffiosi or Chinese
>are
>> behind the entire drugsscene in Holland.
>>
>> T.Blom, Erasmus University Rotterdam: The notorious son of Irene
>Vorrink,
>> Koos Zwart, in those days broadcasted market-reports by radio, in which
>he
>> indicated the streetvalue of any kind of cannabis, weed and marihuana,
>of
>> the market in Amsterdam.
>> I cannot help receiving the impression that he has severely influenced
>the
>> vision of this mother, in those days minister of public health,
>responsible
>> in the first place for the
>> drugspolicy.
>>
>> Network: Goal of Vorrink’s policy was: keep youngsters away from
>> harddrugs. What did it work out? Here are the figures of the
>> Trimbos-Institute, the advice-organ of public health. Heroine-use
>amongst
>> pupils in 1997: average 1 %.
>> Cocaine-use amongst pupils in 1997: 4 % (Holland is here at the 2nd
>place,
>> after America).
>> Amphetamine-use amongst pupils: 8% (Holland is here at the 3rd place,
>after
>> England and America). Finally the popular harddrug XTC: 8% (2nd place,
>after
>> Ireland).
>>
>> Jaap de Vlieger, Rotterdam: The figures of both cocaine and XTC should
>make
>> us scratch our
>> head.
>>
>> Network: The figures of the Trimbos-Institute are supported by those of
>> the European Drugscenter in Lissabon.
>>
>> Network: The opinion of Peter Cohen, drugsinvestigator of the
>University of
>> Amsterdam, has been for 20 years very heavy weighing for the ministry of
>> public health. He all by himself makes objections against the
>> investigation-methods of the Trimbos-Institute, including its figures,
>which
>> he qualifies as “ideologically coloured”.
>>
>> P.Cohen: These figures are, as far as people think they represent the
>> Dutch population, misleading.
>>
>> Network: Cohen cannot imagine that others say the same about his
>critics.
>>
>> Network: Just another aspect: our government is not aware of the harm of
>> cannabis. So far they are of opinion that cannabis is not or hardly
>harmful
>> for someone’s health. Why ?
>>
>> J.Walburg, manager of the Jellinek-clinic: There have been made so far
>> almost no investigations about the effect of cannabis and about the
>> consequences of increasing the
>> active element THC in cannabis, so that we do not know exactly what the
>> consequences are of these new types of cannabis.
>>
>> There are almost no investigations in the field of the relationship
>between
>> psychiatric problems and the use of cannabis, although we badly need
>such
>> knowledge to understand
>> what it means to tolerate cannabis in our society.
>>
>> Network: What is the reason of that lack of investigations ?
>>
>> J.Walburg: The problem is not experienced as a problem.
>> You do not investigate matters that are not considered to be a problem.
>>
>> Network: Would you welcome such investigations ?
>> J.Walburg: Yes, it’s absolutely needed, not only for ourselves, but
>also for
>> our position against other countries. That position is constantly at
>risk
>> because we are so afraid and restraining to
>> report about the consequences of the liberal approach to the law on
>> cannabis.
>>
>> Network: The wish of Jellinek is not honoured by the supporters of a
>> more liberal drugspolicy.
>>
>> P.Cohen: Drugsexperts in Holland always contradict each other. You know
>in
>> advance what people from inside the drugsaddictionscene are going to
>say:
>> – there is always lack of information;
>> – a lot of problems are still to be investigated.
>>
>> Network: And what about the Jellinek-clinic in that respect ?
>>
>> P.Cohen: The Jellinek is of course a large balloon, floating on the
>> atmosphere of this problem-perception.
>>
>> Network: Cohen condemns everyone: Jellinek, Trimbos, Jaap de Vlieger,
>> the police, justice, all of them are good for nothing.
>>
>> T.Blom: The 1976-tolerance-drugspolicy was profiled as follows:
>> – free sale of softdrugs in youth-centra;
>> – sale at small scale, by one housedealer;
>> – without pursuit of gain.
>>
>> Network: Did’nt they think about the idea that sale at large scale
>would be
>> possible ?
>>
>> T.Blom: I have never in any whatsoever document found any indication
>about
>> the possibility that this might become a commercial business, no, they
>were
>> not at all thinking about this.
>>
>> Hessing: And that has become a phenomenon of which we have always said
>> that we tolerated it, but in fact we began to tolerate youth centra,
>next to
>> that we tolerated the fact that criminals took over the business and
>became
>> wealthy, and finally we almost
>> tolerated the implementation of organized crime.
>>
>> Network: Dutch policemen are of the same opinion as Rob Hessing.
>>
>> J.de Vlieger: Since 1976 the tracing and persecution of
>hempproductdelicts
>> has had a low priority for both police and justice, which has been the
>> policy of justice. We had different priorities, there are more dangerous
>> means, demanding our attention.
>>
>> Network: Such like heroine.
>>
>> J.de Vlieger: Such like heroine, cocaine, a.s.o. That’s why you see that
>> criminal organizations flourished exactly by dealing in those field and
>> products, to which police and justice did’nt pay almost any attention.
>>
>> Hessing: They started to make profit, and when this was noticed by
>others,
>> there were organizations, thinking: That business is very much
>profitable.
>> They start to professionalize it, a youth center becomes a coffeeshop,
>and
>> finally it goes beyond all bounds.
>>
>> Network: Unto the Bruinsma’s, the Hakkelaar’s (= Stammemer), the
>Zwolsman-
>> case.
>>
>> Hessing: Exactly.
>>
>> Network: The criminal organizations have become very wealthy, amongst
>others
>> by supplying stocks of softdrugs to coffeeshops. In fact it is
>forbidden,
>> police and justice, however, hardly took notice of the supplying of
>> coffeeshops. The professional description of it reads: tolerating the
>> illegal backdoor of the coffeeshop.
>>
>> Hessing: It remains for me extremely difficult to explain that
>frontdoor-
>> backdoor-policy. That causes me to perform a complex gymnastic stunt.
>When I
>> arrived in Paris, I started to think about what I was going to talk
>about. I
>> did’nt start with explanations about our drugspolicy, to prevent myself
>of
>> getting stucked.
>> I started to talk about safety, which consequently lead to discussions
>about
>> the drugsproblem.
>>
>> Network: Foreign countries do not understand that drugstrade is
>relatively
>> light punished in Holland. And Justice knows that it is a problem.
>>
>> The Public Prosecutor in the Hakkelaar-proces of 1997: If our society
>wants
>> effective fighting against organized crimes and organized wholesale in
>> drugs, and at the same is of opinion
>> that the Dutch drugspolicy should be maintained and be acceptable for
>> foreign countries, then there should be done quickly something with the
>> maxima of punishment.
>>
>> Network: Investigators years ago already presented such signals.
>>
>> C.Steinmetz, onderzoeker: In the begin of 1995 I was charged by the
>ministry
>> of justice to
>> map out how much money circulates in the world of softdrugs, the world
>of
>> hashish and marihuana.
>>
>> Network: What were the results of that investigation ?
>>
>> C. Steinmetz: For me it was totally embarrassing. It was quite clear
>that
>> Dutchmen are no smokers, but nothing more or less than dealers. So the
>> result was: about 19 billion guilders circulate in this world, but no
>more
>> than 0,8 billion guilders in Holland are spent by smoking.
>>
>> Netwerk: After publication the ministry of public health appeared to be
>> quite unhappy with the figures of Steinmetz.
>>
>> Steinmetz: When I am allowed to say so: in fact nothing happened with
>this
>> investigation. My figures were not wellcomed by public health, although
>they
>> are responsible for the health-aspects, and that’s why they so fully
>> co-operated with the tolerance-policy … that means: to guarantee that
>> people in a kind of legal atmosphere can smoke. They, however, were not
>> aware that they possibly were the instigators of criminal trade.
>>
>> Network: Is the ministry of public health co-responsible for the
>increase of
>> heavy criminality ?
>> General manager P.Pennekamp, top-official in the field of drugspolicy,
>is
>> opposed against that. Drugs and criminality are found everywhere, is’nt
>it ?
>>
>> Pennekamp: I think that we meet with any kind of organized crimes in the
>> field of drugs, in Holland, a country with tolerance-policy, as well as
>in
>> Sweden.
>>
>> Network: Klaas Bruinsma, alias the Reverend, killed 10 years ago,
>Etienne
>> U., his succeeder, John V., alias the Stammemer, and also ex-racer
>Charles
>> Zwolsman: they all have one thing in common: they became wealthy of the
>> trade in drugs. In order to get grip on such large dealers, the police
>> started about 1990 with a special unit, called IRT, allowing to import
>large
>> quantities of both softdrugs and harddrugs, with the aim to check the
>> activities of such dealers and to arrest and condemn them. Such acting,
>> however, is opposite the law.
>>
>> Hessing: What started in the sphere of youth centra, became more and
>more
>> criminal, on the one hand tolerating drugsusers and maintaining the same
>> policy for 20 years, even considering it progressive, without innovating
>> anything, on the other hand let the police and justice, the reserve of
>the
>> medal, fight against drugs; this caused an enormous clash, known as the
>> IRT-affair.
>>
>> Network: The parlementarian IRT-investigation, lead by Maarten van Traa
>> (Labour party) was meant to check the infiltration-technics of the
>police.
>>
>> Van Traa: If it for reasons of credibility is necessary to allow the
>import
>> of hash in the environment, then I agree.
>>
>> Network: The police was the only one in the dock, the government itself
>was
>> absent, and this is striking, for it is exactly the government,
>engendering
>> by its tolerance-policy the heavy criminality to expend and become
>wealthy.
>> Almost nothing about that fact, however, in the report of the Van
>> Traa-committee. Unjustly … is the meaning of Otto Vos, member of this
>> committee for the Liberal Party. He has – as is clear now – together
>with
>> Koekkoek from the Christian Democrates, tried to get this
>conclusion/remark
>> in the Van Traa report.
>>
>> Otto Vos: The Van Traa committee has paid attention to the relationship
>> between the softdrugpolicy and the arising of criminality in the
>> Netherlands. It was established that, because the hashtrade was left
>> undisturbed in the years ’70 and ’80, a large amount of organized
>> criminality arose. The minority position of both Koekkoek and me was
>> directed at getting that in an outstanding way expressed in the Van Traa
>> report.
>>
>> Netwerk: Why was it refused ?
>>
>> Otto Vos: A number of members of the committee, including Van Traa
>himself,
>> were opposed to it.
>>
>> Network: We have called professor Koekkoek of the Christian Democrates,
>and
>> he acknowledges the conclusion/remark of Otto Vos.
>>
>> Otto Vos: The conclusion that tolerance-policy has lead to heavy forms
>of
>> criminality, has been very briefly expressed in the Van Traa report.
>>
>> Network: It also did’nt get that much attention from society. How do you
>> explain that ?
>>
>> Otto Vos: The softdrugpolicy has a high ideological impact in Holland.
>So
>> when there is laid a direct relationship between the softdrugpolicy and
>the
>> arising of organized criminality, this is very painful to experience, to
>> establish, to admit. So I think that they do not like to hear that. It
>is -
>> however – reality.
>>
>> Network: They may be did’nt like to start a discussion about that ?
>>
>> T.Blom: It seems so … that they did’nt want to discuss once again
>about
>> the issues, framed in 1976.
>>
>> C.Steinmetz: Summaried in a kind of short sketch we may say: By means
>of the
>> way the softdrugpolicy has been framed, Holland has engendered that
>> criminals got a fantastic chance to deal.
>>
>> Network: Do you agree with the critics of foreign countries at the Dutch
>> softdrugspolicy?
>>
>> Steinmetz: Yes, for they began to discover gradually that all lines
>went via
>> Holland, either direct via Holland, or via – let’s say – via Dutch
>> organizations, working abroad.
>>
>> Network: 25 years tolerance-policy: Holland has no less harddrugsusers
>than
>> countries without tolerance-policy. We have a prominent position in the
>> trade of all kinds of drugs, and a great attraction on drugstourists
>from
>> all over the world. Yet Holland is still fond of its roll as pioneer.
>Not
>> any country, however, still takes our drugsexperiment seriously.
>>
>> Hessing: I think that we may blame ourselves. We have so long advocated
>our
>> progessive policy, we may, however, also conclude that we during the
>years
>> ’70 and ’80 in fact came to a standstill.
>>
>> J.Walburg (Jellinek): Internationally seen we cannot join in the
>> conservation authoratively, because every time they think: Your talks
>are
>> charming, but you produce drugs, and our children go to your country to
>buy
>> drugs … that kind of business.
>> So what I mean is: this causes our initiatives to get stuck. That’s why
>I
>> say: we should try, when taking an initiative, to find partners in
>Germany,
>> or in France, or in Belgium, for all
>> by ourselves we really need not at all to launch arguments for the
>changing
>> of the drugspolicy.
>>
>> Network: It took 25 years to openly critisize our so “holy”
>> tolerance-policy. A policy that did’nt succeed in keeping away
>youngsters
>> from harddrugs. A policy that made criminal organizations become many
>> billions more wealthy.
>>
>> Network: It is said that ideologies have disappeared/no longer exist.
>But
>> take a look at the discussion about the drugspolicy, and you will get
>the
>> impression that facts and figures are apparently less important than
>> ideological conceptions./Rotterdam, 13-3- 2000. P. Huurman.
>

————————————————————————
For å sende et innlegg til gruppa, send det til: rusbehandling@eGroups.comFor å melde deg ut,send en tom e-post til: rusbehandling-unsubscribe@eGroups.com

————————————————————————
Special Offer-Earn 300 Points from MyPoints.com for trying @Backup
Get automatic protection and access to your important computer files.
Install today:
http://click.egroups.com/1/2344/1/_/262263/_/954490649/

– Easily schedule meetings and events using the group calendar!
http://www.egroups.com/cal?listname=rusbehandling&m=1

Zombie Powder Is New Colombian National Drug Problem

Media Awareness Project

 

Knight Ridder News Service (US)
Pubdate: Mon, 07 Feb 2000

Zombie Powder Is New Colombian National Drug Problem

Author: TIM JOHNSON, Knight Ridder News Service

BOGOTA, Colombia — When Colombians talk about a national drug problem, it’s sometimes not cocaine or heroin they mean. It’s burundanga.A tasteless and odorless powder, burundanga sends those who consume it into a voodoo-like trance. Dozens of times each week, somewhere in Colombia, a criminal sprinkles the soluble powder into the food or drink of a victim, then waits for the person to turn into a disoriented zombie — awake and talkative but powerless to resist orders.

Criminals then tell their victims to make bank withdrawals, hand over their car keys and clothing, perhaps deliver narcotics, or even help empty their own apartments of furniture.

What’s more, under the effects of burundanga, victims suffer temporary amnesia. The hard drive in their brain goes blank until the drug wears off.

“A lot of times, the victim can’t even remember what the criminal looks like. So it’s very difficult to arrest anyone,” said Dr. Camilo Uribe, a toxicologist and Colombia’s premier expert on the substance.

In the 1960s, when crooks began using burundanga, they picked out victims in bus terminals or seedy bars. But nowadays, no one is safe from the drug. Among victims in the past year are a state governor, prominent lawyers, entire families doped up by their maids, and thousands of other victims.

“Everybody knows somebody who’s been given this drug,” said Elkin Osorio, an epidemiologist with the Bogota city health department.

Burundanga is so common that a State Department travel advisory warns of it: “The drug is administered in drinks in bars, through cigarettes and gum in taxis, and in powder form. … The drug renders the person disoriented and can cause prolonged unconsciousness and serious medical problems.”

In Bogota alone, a capital of 6.5 million people, hospitals go through 8,500 kits a year to test for chemical intoxication, Osorio said. He added that many of those cases turn out to be burundanga. Asked whether Bogota might have 1,000 cases a month, he said, “It’s a lot higher. You can be sure.”

Uribe estimated that Colombia’s largest cities have hundreds of cases a month. Other experts offered lower estimates. But they noted that many victims never report to authorities.

Colombia is alone with the problem. Burundanga has been reported in Ecuador and Venezuela, but criminals there seem to fear the substance, which can permanently impair or kill victims. If mishandled, it muddles up the crook instead of the victim.

Burundanga has been around since before the discovery of the New World. Its active ingredient, scopolamine, is found in a plant from the nightshade family known as borrachera (drunken binge), which grows in the high Andes.

“Here in Bogota, you can find it in the parks,” Uribe said, adding that most criminals now use laboratory-produced scopolamine from the black market.

Scopolamine can make users extremely aggressive, so criminals in the 1980s began mixing it with other drugs, like tranquilizers. Colombians know the chemical cocktail as burundanga — pronounced boo-roon-DAHN-gah — and inventive criminals offer it orally, mixed with gaseous substances or even apparently as a powder in cigarettes.

Taxi drivers say victims sometimes flag them down in a trance.

“We call them `the disoriented ones,”’ said Omar Echavarria, a taxi driver in Medellin, Colombia’s third-largest city. “They get in the taxi, and you ask them where they are going. They say they don’t know. They don’t even know who they are. They get in a taxi out of instinct.”

When doped-up passengers arrive at hospital emergency rooms for treatment, doctors normally give them diuretics to flush out their kidneys. Those who received small doses of the drug usually recover within a half-day.

What happened to Erick Schaffer is a common story. Schaffer, a Nicaraguan, walked into a discotheque along well-traveled Seventh Avenue one night a few months ago. After that, his memory is blank.

“The next day, I came to,” Schaffer said. “A doorman was trying to open the garage door of an apartment building, and it woke me. I was sitting down on the sidewalk in a daze. He took me to my apartment.”

Schaffer said the criminals spent about $1,000 on one of his credit cards.

Now, he tells visitors: “Don’t go to the bathroom and leave your beer or they may toss in the drug. … Don’t accept soft drinks or buy cigarettes on the street. Or candy. Or anything else.”

The use of burundanga is so common — and Colombia so ridden by violence — that such robberies almost never make the newspapers.

An exception occurred when Juan Carlos Vives, governor of Magdalena, one of Colombia’s 33 states, was slipped burundanga at Bogota’s fanciest mall, the Centro Andino, last April.

“Two men came up to me and asked for the time. I don’t remember their faces or anything after that,” the 44-year-old Vives said. He led the men to his apartment. “I don’t remember it, but the doormen say that I entered the apartment with them.”

He said he regained consciousness the next day to discover that the men had stolen about $7,000, all his credit cards, some jewelry, a guitar “and even my reading glasses,” Vives said.

Colombians sometimes aren’t safe even in their own homes.

Mauricio Velasquez, 18, sat down to lunch with his brother, sister and mother in their Medellin home 11 months ago. A young housekeeper hired 10 days earlier served them rice and beans.

“When we got up, I passed out,” he said. So did his mother, Marina, and a 14-year-old brother, Andres Felipe. Luckily, a sister, Paula Andrea, 18, ate little. Semi-conscious, she dialed a boyfriend on a cellular telephone.

“The boyfriend came, saw what had happened and locked up the housekeeper,” Velasquez said. He said police arrested the housekeeper and an accomplice, and determined that their plan was to clean the house of jewelry.

Many victims never go to the authorities. Some realize they don’t know who slipped them the drug. Others feel embarrassed over what happened.

“I’d say 70 percent of the cases are never reported,” said Jairo Martinez, an expert at Colombia’s equivalent of the FBI. “People are ashamed they didn’t take security measures. Or they were somewhere they shouldn’t have been, like a brothel.”

Burundanga-bearing criminals lurk around airports, bus terminals and popular bars, or go door-to-door pretending to be salespeople, persuading housewives to take whiffs of products containing the powder and some sort of gaseous admixture.

Scantily clad women frequenting bars sometimes slip burundanga into drinks of unsuspecting men — giving them a time they’ll never remember.

Even criminals fall victim.

In a case in 1996, six people came into Medellin’s Las Vegas Clinic in a daze, waylaid by illness on the way to the airport, Dr. Hugo Gallego, a prominent Medellin toxicologist, said. Hours later, one vomited up a capsule filled with cocaine. All six were “mules,” and someone had drugged them with the hope of commandeering the narcotics-packed capsules, Gallego added.

Ever inventive, some Colombians have turned the burundanga epidemic to their favor. Philandering husbands sometimes wander into hospitals for tests after spending days with girlfriends, eager for a plausible excuse to explain away their absence on the home front.

“It’s simply a way for them to go home and not have any problems,” said Dr. Sergio Alvarez, an emergency-room physician in Medellin.

MAP posted-by: Don Beck

US CO: ‘No-Knock’ Raids Not Colorblind

Media Awareness ProjectPubdate: Sun, 20 Feb 2000

Source: Denver Rocky Mountain News (CO)

US CO: ‘No-Knock’ Raids Not Colorblind

Author: Kevin Flynn, Lou Kilzer, Staff Writers

More than 82 percent of Denver’s “no-knock” raids in 1999 targeted minority residents.A Denver Rocky Mountain News analysis of 178 no-knock warrants issued last year showed that white suspects were targeted in only 14 percent of the cases. In slightly more than 3 percent of the searches, the race of the suspect was not disclosed.

Denver’s population is 56 percent white and 44 percent minority, according to 1997 Census estimates.

The disparity has some community activists saying, “I told you so.”

“Is it an abuse of power that basically has been overlooked?” asked Rev. Gill Ford, president of the Colorado NAACP. “I think the numbers are demonstrating that it is.”

“The statistic is not surprising,” said LeRoy Lemos, spokesman for a committee seeking changes in police no-knock policies. “It’s something we’ve been saying for a long time.”

Mayor Wellington Webb and senior police administrators declined to comment on the News’ findings.

The records analyzed by the News also indicate that the changes activists are seeking might already be taking place.

Since the fatal shooting of Mexican national Ismael Mena in a botched no-knock raid Sept. 29, the number of such search warrants has plummeted.

From November through January, police obtained search warrants for 23 no-knock raids, compared to 64 such warrants granted in the same period a year earlier.

Police would not comment on the decline.

Police have been under intense criticism since the killing of Mena, who lived on the second floor of a two-story house at 3738 High St.

Although officials knew almost immediately after the shooting that they had raided the wrong house, they didn’t acknowledge it publicly for two months.

On Dec. 7, they raided the house next door at 3742 High St, which had been the original target. They recovered three small bags of crack and suspected cocaine. They also arrested two people, including a 13-year-old boy who informants said had been selling crack.

In the aftermath of the Mena raid, a Denver police officer said she felt pressured to fabricate reports about trouble at his house.

Jefferson County District Attorney Dave Thomas, acting as special prosecutor in the investigation, found no evidence of wrongdoing by her supervisors. But two of them, including the District 2 commander, Capt. Marco Vasquez, were transferred.

Thomas filed perjury charges against Joseph Bini, the officer who filed the sworn affidavit for the search at Mena’s house. The charges accuse Bini of “unlawfully and knowingly” lying on the Mena affidavit.

Thomas also cleared the SWAT officers who participated in the raid and shot Mena.

Police Chief Tom Sanchez resigned under pressure four days later.

No-knock raids are a key police weapon in the war against drugs.

Denver District Attorney Bill Ritter, who is independent of the city administration, said the police practice of targeting suspected crack houses in minority neighborhoods was sparked by residents in the same neighborhoods more than six years ago.

In the wake of a series of gang-related drive-by shootings in what came to be called the Summer of Violence in 1993, citizens at Webb’s Safe City Summit demanded a police crackdown on drug dealers in their neighborhoods.

“This is very much in response to the community concern that was voiced in 1993,” said Ritter, who attended many of the sessions.

The NAACP’s Ford said that no-knock raids targeting major drug dealers are a legitimate police response.

But he said that far too many such raids are aimed at “nickel-and-dime buys” involving low-level drug users and dealers.

Ritter said police might be more cautious now in the aftermath of the Mena killing, accounting for the decline in no-knock raids. Ritter is on a panel with Chief Denver County Judge Robert Patterson, and Safety Manager Butch Montoya that is reviewing procedures for no-knock raid policies.

Court records for 1999 show that many of the raids were based on the time-tested and legal practice of “controlled buys” of narcotics by a trusted police informant — usually a drug user who has agreed to cooperate.

As a result, many of the raids — especially those initiated by Bini and other street patrol officers — are based on $20 or $40 crack buys.

Often, the records showed, the amount of drugs seized in the raids was less than police expected to find.

During the investigation leading to a raid in August in the 3400 block of Humboldt Street — a house also raided in May — Bini and his partner, Dan Andrews, watched from a nearby porch as people entered the house for a few minutes then left.

One suspect was followed, found in possession of crack cocaine and arrested.

On that basis, a no-knock raid was authorized for the next day.

According to court documents, police recovered a VCR, two CD players and some hats — but no drugs.

“Would a $20 rock of coke suffice to use a no-knock in Cherry Creek?” Ford asked rhetorically, citing one of the city’s wealthiest neighborhoods.

“I would hope for a total reappraisal” of the raid policy, Ford added. “I would also hope that the district attorney’s office as well as the judges would expect more substance than that.

“Probable cause is one of the broadest areas that you can look at. And it really becomes a point of discretion, and that discretion can be abused. And that appears to be what’s going on here.”

Mark Silverstein, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Colorado, said the level of evidence police presented in requesting some of the search warrants was surprisingly low.

Police raided a house on Josephine Street although the search warrant affidavit, written by Bini’s partner Andrews, did not claim that drugs were in the house.

In the sworn statement, Bini, Andrews and officer Kelly Ohu took an informant to the area to make a controlled buy.

The informant met a man in front of the house then went behind the house. Later, the informant said the transaction occurred behind the house, out of sight of the officers.

“The police have no business taking this request to the judge. The DA has no business approving it, and the judge has no business signing it on that kind of affidavit,” Silverstein said.

Ritter said that current policies are stricter than the law requires.

“I think there is a real concern that prior to our committee looking at these things and giving direction, they have changed their practices and become more cautious,” Ritter said.

“If we’re going to impose requirements on the police that are stricter than the legal requirements, that’s the question we have to answer as a city,” he said.

Although Webb declined to discuss the issue with the News last week, he previously has said he wants police to continue to include no-knock raids in their arsenal of crime-fighting tools.

Ritter indicated that one question the review panel will examine is the adequacy of police training in preparing search warrants.

David Bruno, Bini’s attorney, said that Bini received no training in preparing search warrant affidavits. Bruno said Bini was teaching other officers his practices despite having no training himself.

Assistant District Attorney Chuck Lepley has taught search warrant classes at the police academy but said most cops hone their skills on the streets.

“In practice, whatever training they get in the academy moves into the practical environment, where they pick up things from other officers,” Lepley said. “If those other officers have bad habits, that’ll get picked up.”

The News’ analysis of Denver’s 178 no-knock raids shows that 80 percent of those initiated by veteran narcotics detectives resulted in substantial recovery of illegal drugs.

Sixty-four percent of those raids initiated by street officers such as Bini found substantial amounts, the News analysis showed.

Lepley said that experienced narcotics detectives generally prepare authoritative search warrant affidavits.

Lepley singled out Detective Mike Gassman as someone who routinely double-checks confidential informants’ information.

Gassman’s affidavits show extensive corroboration, such as driver’s license checks, utility records and other methods to verify to a judge that the target of the investigation, in fact, lives in the house police want to raid.

Lemos, spokesman for the Justice for Mena Committee, said it isn’t true that police target minorities because most drug trafficking involves them.

“It’s very clear that the drug problem in America is not an inner-city problem alone but a problem that also plagues suburbia,” he said. “The difference is the enforcement.

“White Americans would not stand for police to enforce no-knock warrants in their communities,” he said.

“Sadly,” Ford added, “we don’t monitor the police, and we just simply trust them to do the right thing. I think we’re finding that that trust is being misplaced.”

Of the five raids Bini initiated for which an inventory of seized property was returned, no drugs were found in two of them, including the Mena raid. The other three raids found small amounts typical of what a user, rather than a dealer, would have.

One person who says she was a victim of an unfounded Bini no-knock warrant was Linda Smith, a reading teacher who has lived in her north Denver home for 16 years.

She says that first targeted her 26-year-old daughter’s house then turned on her when her daughter came to stay with her.

In the spring, black-clad SWAT team members burst into her home with rifles and guns drawn, shouting commands. Smith said the house was crowded with relatives, including three grandchildren ages 1 to 9.

Smith said the children burst into tears when one leader of the SWAT team called males in the family “roaches.”

She said no drugs were found. However, the police, she said, threatened to seize her home.

The search warrant for Smith’s home did not include a required follow-up inventory that lists the items, if any, that were seized. As a result, the News could not verify Smith’s version of events.

Contact Kevin Flynn at (303) 892-5247 or flynnk@RockyMountainNews.com . Contact Lou Kilzer at (303) 892-2644 or kilzerl@RockyMountainNews.com .

MAP posted-by: Doc-Hawk

Thailand: Drugs Case Britons Are Released From Thai Jail

Media Awareness ProjectPubdate: Thu, 24 Feb 2000

Source: Daily Telegraph (UK)

Thailand: Drugs Case Britons Are Released From Thai Jail

Author: Paul Baldwin

TWO British backpackers were released on bail from prison in Thailand last night three weeks after police allegedly discovered drugs in their room.Judith Payne, a 21-year-old dental nurse, and James Gilligan, 25 and unemployed, were arrested at gunpoint after drugs officers raided a guest house and allegedly uncovered opium and cannabis.

Gilligan, from Pontefract, West Yorks, is reported to have admitted possessing the drugs but Payne, from Castleford, also West Yorks, said she did not know they were there and only offered to share her room because Gilligan had nowhere to stay.

A British embassy official described the pair as “the luckiest people in the world” after lengthy legal negotiations secured their release on bail from the notorious “Bangkok Hilton” jail on sureties of UKP5,000 each.

Payne said she was delighted to have been released from the “hellish conditions” at the Women’s Correctional Institute.

Gilligan, released from the nearby Central Correctional Institute for Drug Addicts at the same time, was similarly relieved but both have been banned from leaving Thailand before their trial, which could be up to two years. If they are convicted on charges of possessing half a kilogram of cannabis end five grams of opium they face a maximum of six years.

In a statement to police Gilligan admitted possessing the drugs. Last night he said: “It was all my fault. I bought the drugs and took them to Judith’s room. I am very sorry for the trouble I have caused. I am willing to stay and face the music. I do not have any convictions and pray that they will give me a suspended sentence.”

Payne, whose guest house room was in Khaosarn Road – setting of the opening scene of the film The Beach – said she only met Gilligan on the day of her arrest. She said: “As soon as the drugs were found James put his hands up, he did the honourable thing. I’m relieved I don’t want to go through that hell again.”

Payne, who was on her first trip abroad, said her parents had been unaware of her arrest until days ago as they had been on holiday. Her mother Valerie, who stood the UKP5,000 bail, said last night: “We are relieved but it is early days. I have spoken to her and she seems alright.”

Describing the conditions in jail, Payne said: “I have been sleeping in a room with people squashed in like sardines, head to toe. I got to wash once a day, but was allowed only three scoops of a shallow bowl to pour over myself.”

MAP posted-by: Jo-D

US MD: Police Rule Was Ignored Before Death

Media Awareness ProjectPubdate: Mon, 21 Feb 2000

Source: Washington Post (DC)

US MD: Police Rule Was Ignored Before Death

Author: Craig Whitlock, Washington Post Staff Writer

Pr. George’s Manual Says To Get Suspect on Drugs HelpPrince George’s County police failed to follow their rules for handling drugged-out suspects when, according to their account, they left Elmer Clayton Newman Jr. handcuffed in a cell and waited more than an hour to get him medical help before he died.

According to the police department’s General Order Manual, officers are supposed to take suspects to a hospital as soon as they “exhibit bizarre behavior,” or complain of sickness, or if it is obvious that the person is high on drugs.

Newman, 29, was arrested early in the morning of Sept. 22 after officers responded to his Suitland apartment for a 911 call. Police said he attacked them with his fists for no reason, was in a state of “delirium” and acted so out of control that they had to use pepper spray to subdue him.

But instead of driving to a hospital, as their orders dictate, the Prince George’s officers took Newman to the Oxon Hill district station, where they locked him in a cell with his handcuffs still on. Police said Newman continued to thrash around and beat his head against the wall, but they did not call paramedics until an hour later when they noticed he had passed out.

Police officials declined to comment on why Newman wasn’t given medical treatment earlier, saying the case was still under investigation. “That I can’t answer,” said Royce D. Holloway, a police spokesman.

After completing an autopsy, the Maryland chief medical examiner ruled the case a homicide, attributing Newman’s death to both a cocaine overdose and injuries he sustained at the hands of police. The FBI and Prince George’s prosecutors are conducting separate investigations.

Five months later, with authorities saying little else, exactly what happened to Elmer Newman remains unclear. Prince George’s police have given conflicting accounts of several key aspects of the case and have been challenged by witnesses on other points, according to documents and interviews.

Shortly after Newman died, for example, police said he had sustained “contusions” to his wrists when officers handcuffed him but did not appear to have any other injuries. Last week, however, police acknowledged that the medical examiner’s report states Newman suffered neck and chest injuries so severe that they contributed to his death.

Police also have given contradictory statements about how many officers were involved.

In September, police said they placed five officers on routine administrative leave pending the outcome of an investigation. Last week, however, they said that seven officers actually had been put on leave.

Holloway said the seven officers were allowed to return to work last Friday and had been assigned desk jobs. He said he could not explain why they were permitted to come back to work with the investigation still open.

Other parts of the police department’s story have been questioned. For instance, Police Chief John S. Farrell described Newman as a “huge” man who weighed 300 pounds and fought the officers with “tremendous strength,” even after police handcuffed him.

But Newman’s relatives said he weighed no more than 230 pounds. And a 65-year-old neighbor who saw Newman’s arrest through the peephole of her apartment across the hall said he did not resist as two officers detained him and led him from the building.

Christopher A. Griffiths, an attorney for Newman’s family, said police bungled the case from the start.

“They killed him by leaving him on the floor of that jail cell to die,” he said. “It was deliberate. Why were they beating him and restraining him and keeping him in a holding cell? Why wasn’t he taken to the hospital?”

Prince George’s community leaders who monitor the police department said the lack of clear answers also has made them skeptical.

“There is something fishy and suspicious about this,” said Eugene Grant, a Seat Pleasant resident who is a member of Farrell’s police advisory board. “I still don’t think the truth has come out . . . . It’s difficult to trust anything [the police] say.”

Edythe Flemings Hall, president of the Prince George’s chapter of the NAACP, said she plans to meet with Farrell and County Executive Wayne K. Curry (D) to discuss the Newman case and other instances in which people died after struggling with police.

“I expect the police to bring a person into submission without killing them,” she said.

Newman was one of eight people who died in 1999 after struggling with Prince George’s police, including five men who were fatally shot during altercations. Three of the deaths remain under investigation by local authorities. Officers involved in the other cases were cleared by prosecutors and grand juries, police said.

A Prince George’s native, Elmer Newman grew up in Capitol Heights with his mother and two older sisters and graduated from Bowie High School. Family members said he worked an assortment of odd jobs, most recently taking inventory in warehouses.

His mother, Clarcy Newman, said he had six children but never married. He lived with his mother until a few months before his death, when he moved into an apartment in Suitland with a girlfriend.

“He was a mother’s boy–we spoiled him to death,” Clarcy Newman said. “He was real quiet and liked to stay in the house most of the time. But he was a really fun-loving person who loved to make people laugh.”

Newman was convicted once, in March 1991, of a single count of theft and given a suspended sentence, according to Prince George’s court records.

There is no indication that he had any more encounters with the police until Sept. 22, 1999, when he picked up the phone in his apartment at 2:18 a.m. and called 911 to report a break-in.

It is unclear what happened after that. Police refused to release a tape of the 911 call. They also refused to disclose records of police radio dispatches that would reveal how many officers responded to the incident and pinpoint their movements.

Newman was taken by ambulance from the police station to Fort Washington Hospital at 4:11 a.m. and was pronounced dead shortly thereafter. His body was then taken to the state medical examiner’s morgue in Baltimore.

Theodore King, the examiner who conducted the autopsy, ruled the cause of death as “cardiac arrhythmia . . . related to cocaine intoxication and multiple neck and chest injuries related to restraint during police custody,” according to police. He also ruled the death a homicide.

King declined to comment and would not release the full autopsy report, saying the matter was still under investigation by police. Prince George’s police also refused to release their copy of the autopsy findings, referring inquiries to the medical examiner’s office.

Police said they have turned over the results of their investigation to the Prince George’s State’s Attorney’s Office, which is expected to bring the case to a grand jury. It will be up to prosecutors and the grand jury to determine if officers’ actions were justified or if criminal charges are warranted.

Farrell played down the homicide ruling by the medical examiner, saying that it didn’t mean that officers did anything wrong. “It’s not unusual where they call it a homicide,” he said of cases, such as fatal shootings, in which people die after struggling with police.

But forensic pathologists interviewed by The Washington Post said the medical examiner was making a clear distinction by ruling Newman’s death a homicide, as opposed to an accident.

“It becomes a judgment call as to how the police are restraining him,” said Robert Kirschner, former deputy chief medical examiner in Cook County, Ill. “If there’s evidence that the restraint was excessive, then [the medical examiners] would probably call it a homicide.”

Added Jonathan L. Arden, the D.C. medical examiner: “That’s the judgment call that has to be based on the autopsy findings and investigation. You have to weigh how severe the injuries are and other factors.”

MAP posted-by: Jo-D

1. International Drug Users Day (IDUD)1999 -1 November By Theo Van Dam & Daan Van der Gouwe

November 1, 1999, Zaandam, the Netherlands

Organised by Landelijk Steunpunt Druggebruikers (LSD) & National Interest Group of Drug Users

On November 1 1999, LSD organised their fourth annual ‘Drug Users Day’.

Reported by: Theo Van Dam & Daan Van der Gouwe

In our first three years, we organised our events in Utrecht, Amsterdam, and The Hague.

They were mainly ‘national’ events for Dutch users, offering drug users the opportunity to meet and discuss topics of mutual interest with social workers, politicians and others professionals.

Drug users have found this day very valuable – and not just because it is possible to use drugs here!

At least for one day in the year, there are no people looking at you with disdain, and one feels accepted as a ‘human being’, so to speak.

Not surprisingly, this annual Drug Users day is now well known amongst both drug users and drug workers in every corner of our (small) country.

This year, reflecting both the trend towards greater European integration and the extension of LSD’s activities abroad, it was decided that this Fourth Annual day should be an international event, and therefore user groups from many other countries were invited to send representatives.

LSD applied for and received extra funding to cover some of these expenses, and so we were able to invite a number of people from other countries.

User groups from nine different countries spent the day itself in workshops discussing themes of common interest, and then joined together to have fun in a closing party, which even included a band consisting of several police officers from the ‘infamous’ Warmoesstraat police station in Amsterdam!

This report will give you an insight into the events of International Drug Users Day, November 1, as well as telling you a bit about the activities that led up to the day itself.

LSD would like to thank the Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sports for their assistance, as their support made all this possible.

The Day Before

As we said earlier, this was the first time that LSD had organised an international happening.

Invitations were sent out to all the Dutch user groups or junkie-unions – and in response large delegations of users from all the cities came on the day, – as well as social workers, politicians,
and other interested parties attending.

This time, we also invited representatives from user groups in other countries.

We were very pleased that members of user groups from Belgium, France, Germany, UK, Russian Federation, Slovenia, Spain and Ireland were able to participate in our event.

The day before the meeting, the international delegates met together at the MDHG in Amsterdam, one of the oldest user groups in the Netherlands.

Also attending the meeting were a member of the Dutch Parliament and a film crew from Dutch Breakfast TV.

At this meeting, members of LSD explained to the delegates how their organisation had started, and why it had been set up in the first place.

They outlined the aims and objectives of their project and described the activities of the organisation. In particular, they discussed their reasons for holding an annual Drug Users Day.

After this, some informal discussions took place – and finally delegates were briefed on the quality and availability of various local drugs, as well as on local ‘user etiquette’.

A general misconception among tourists is that all drugs are legal in the Netherlands and that one can smoke or shoot up dope everywhere without any problems.

Unfortunately, many people still find out ‘the hard way’ that this is not true.

LSD then spoke about the development of current Dutch drug policy and talked about the general trend amongst local drug users to inject less and smoke (or ‘chase’) their dope much more.

Finally, a friendly warning was given to the international delegates about the difference in the quality of dope in Holland in comparison to other countries, and the unpleasant consequences
that this could have for unwary users.

The International Drug Users Day 1999

The 1999 Drug User day took place at a concert hall in Zaandam not far from Amsterdam – where usually any drug use other than cannabis is prohibited.

LSD took responsibility for providing and managing a safe-injection room, which was located in a quiet corner of the building.

Necessary items such as clean needles, ascorbic acid and sterile water were freely available there.

In the main area, delegates were allowed to smoke dope.

Because the policy was to keep drug-using ‘indoors’, there were no complaints about the event
from the surrounding neighbourhood.

Although drug use was permitted during the conference, delegates were successfully encouraged to postpone their drug use until the party later in the day – as there was some work to do first!

Workshops

Approximately 250 delegates attended the formal conference event. Workshops were held simultaneously in three different locations in the building.

It was agreed that each of the countries present would facilitate a workshop.

The conference was held in English, as this was the most common shared language amongst delegates. However, this was sometimes difficult as most delegates did not speak English as their native language, and some had problems.

However- everyone seemed to feel that it all worked out well in the end.

Here is a short overview of the main topics that were discussed in the various workshops.

Workshop Belgium by Tonny (BAD)

The workshop was about the setting-up of user groups in Antwerp, and what they have already achieved in less than a year.

BAD started early 1999 as a result of a peer education project.

The Flemish policy on drug users has always been one of repression and non-acceptance.

This has lead to overcrowded prisons, an increase of drug related harm, and in particular, deteriorating health for many drug users.

BAD wants to change this all, but as it is the case in many other countries, drug users in Belgium are a controversial topic of discussion.

Rarely do policymakers speak with us.

Our group meets weekly and is being supported by Antwerp outreach teams and the Free Clinic.

They have started interviewing about 100 drug users in Antwerp to find out what services they feel should be available.

BAD took the results of this survey to the local authorities and together we discussed these things.

As a direct result of this initiative, BAD has now joined a regular meeting attended by all the ‘stakeholders’ (e.g. doctors, health workers etc.), who determine Antwerp’s drug policy, and so now we can start to influence policy development.

In fact, recent Flemish drug policy does seems to be evolving and becoming a bit less repressive, as there are now talks underway about providing users with safe injection rooms.

BAD is also involved in the set-up of Needle Exchange in Antwerp.

Workshop Germany by Astrid (JES Rhein-Main)

Astrid kicked off her presentation with a general talk on JES (which stands for “Junkies, Ex-Junkies and People on scripts”), an organisation that is similar in many ways to ASUD in France or LSD in the Netherlands.

JES Germany consists of about forty local user groups, loosely organised under an umbrella organsation in Berlin.

This ‘umbrella’ is represented by four official speakers, who are elected by the annual general assembly of JES, and (until recently) a paid co-ordinator, who organised seminars and courses for users about political work.

The workshop discussed the problems presently facing JES – and in particular, the decision by Deutsche Aids Hilfe (who paid for the co-ordinator of the German network), that they could no longer fund this post.

The group expects that the main impact of this decision will be some organisational problems, but they are confident that they will be able to manage such problems if they occur.

Astrid and Monika also spoke about their own organisation in Frankfurt – JES Rhein-Main.

Besides their involvement in JES Rhein-Main, Monika and Astrid also produce JuBaz (Junkfurther Ballergazette), a magazine about drug use for drug users that has been published for more than 10 years now!

Workers with JuBaz get professional training, and there is magasine policy of ‘no censorship’.

This makes the magazine truly independent, despite the fact that it is financed by a local drug help association.

Workshop United Kingdom by Chris (National Network of Drug Users)

Chris facilitated a workshop on political lobbying, and talked about effective ways to put pressure on (local) authorities in order to achieve what we want.

Because the war on drugs is being fought at many frontiers, we must organise ourselves on as many fronts as possible.

Uniting as many opponents to prohibition as possible and formulating common goals is particularly important, as this will give us the ability to lobby politicians more effectively.

One problem that we face is that many politicians are prepared to support a more liberal drugs policy in private, but dare not say this in public.

Organising events like this is an important way to set up a solid political lobby and to give a voice to those who suffer most from present drug policy.

Finally, Chris felt that there were two factors that were in our favour.

At a time when politicians are desperate to reduce government spending, the war on drugs is extremely expensive!

He also stated that the rise of the Internet, with its ability to link people together, may very well be the most powerful weapon we have at present in the war on the ‘War on Drugs’.

Workshop France by Gilles (ASUD)

ASUD is a nation-wide network of user groups in France.

Their speaker, Gilles, put forward a rather gloomy image of life as a drug user in France nowadays.

It seems that some users have deliberately allowed themselves to become infected with HIV in order to get access to treatment with morphine-sulphate (Moscontin/Skenan) Also many amputations occur amongst drug users as a result of abscesses.

There are not many substitution programmes yet in France, and the ones that do exist (Methadone, buprenorphine) don’t give the users what they want, and so in order to get a buzz, many users end up injecting these substances, and by doing so risk abscesses or worse.

Also some users take large quantities of (extra-) strong beer in order to get a buzz.

This is all a result of the failure of current substitution programmes to meet the needs of drug users.

Another important part of ASUD’s work is fighting for the right to pleasure!

Contrary to the opinion of many drug professionals, most drug users take drugs not because they are unhappy, or have had a bad childhood, but because it is fun and pleasurable!

Harm reduction can only succeed when the authorities take this basic fact into consideration – but current drugs policy in France still prohibits needle exchange, or the testing of pills etc. for users.

Another problem ASUD faces, when publishing their regular magazine for drug users, is that French law expressly forbids them to publish pro-drug opinions and speak too openly about legalisation and related subjects.

Workshop Spain by Catalan drug User s Network

The Spanish representative also described the current situation in their country, and in particular, in the Catalan region of Spain.

There is a drop in centre, a needle exchange, and an outreach team working in Catalina, but this all has only just started.

The same is true for the user group.

They meet on a regular basis, and they also have a (sort of) Drug Users day that is held in December.

The distribution of methadone in Catalonia was discussed, and in particular, the efforts which the group has made to try to improve this facility.

The Users Network constantly put pressure on the service by informing them how and why the service should improve, and this seems to be very successful.

Part two OF REPORT

Workshop Slovenia by Vera, Dragica, Dare

The Slovene delegation spoke about the collaboration in Slovenia between user groups and the University, as well as making some general remarks about drug use in Slovenia.

For a couple of years now, a harm reduction-based approach has been developed in Slovenia, albeit only in Ljubljana and Koper.

There are some active outreach workers who are active, and it is possible to exchange needles and syringes, but that’s about it.

However, Slovenia has found ways to get European money for various programmes and researches.

Therefore a lot of research has recently started, examining different aspects of drug use and related matters.

But what is particularly interesting about these initiatives is that drug users themselves are involved in all aspects of these studies and programmes.

In fact, drug users even provide training for our social workers about the daily life of a user in Slovenia!

Workshop Russian Federation by Alec and Vitalec (MSF-H Harm Reduction Unit) (plenary)

Alec and Vitalec from Moscow facilitated a ‘plenary’ session in which they described what it is like being a drug user in Russia, especially in Moscow.

Russia has a very repressive policy towards drug use and drug users.

As we see elsewhere, this kind of policy often leads to bad health conditions – and recently a serious HIB epidemic broke out.

Becoming infected with HIV/ Hepatitis is very easy, as there are very strong penalties on the possession of needles.

This has led to massive sharing of needles, which in turn has lead to many users contracting infections of many kinds.

There are some needle exchange facilities, but such work is forced ‘underground’ by current drugs policy, and therefore such services only reaches a minority of drug users.

Detoxification is the only ‘treatment’ available, and there are no methadone programmes available, and there are no user groups at all.

However, for the last two years there has been an outreach team active on the streets of Moscow.

They reach a lot of users and provide them with relevant information.

In the near future, the team will start working on relationships with the police, in order to persuade them to change their opinions on drug use and drug users.

Step by step, we are trying to make it possible for drug users to live like other civilians with the same rights and the same access to care.

Another important topic in the near future is to help drug users to start their own user organisations.

At the moment it is not possible to speak up as a drug user without facing all kinds of punishments.

Therefore, a proper drug-user organisation is very necessary.

Workshop Basements by Liesbeth

A final short session was held about a Dutch model of safe rooms, called the ‘Basement’.

There are at present four such ‘Basements’, and they are all located in Rotterdam and run mainly by dealers.

Such initiatives appear to be a cheap and safe alternative to more orthodox ‘legal’ safe injecting rooms.

In these rooms it is allowed to use drugs, although injection is not allowed.

The concept is as follows: a dealer rents a location and turns it into a sort of ‘bar’.

Behind the bar, we find a dealer dealing cocaine and heroin, but also selling fruit juices and other such refreshments.

Agreements are made with neighbourhood and local authorities.

If the dealer keeps his place clean and if the Basement does not cause harm, they will allow it to continue.

In the actual basement, which is located downstairs; users are allowed to use their dope.

A doorman looks after the general atmosphere, and ensures that users do not hang about outside when leaving the building etc.

The co-operation that has been needed between these Basement projects and the police has led to some interesting discussions!

Dr.Alderwright-trophy

As in the preceding 3 years, this year the Dr. Alderwright-trophy was again awarded to the initiative, individual, or organisation which Dutch user groups feel have been the most “user-friendly”.

The award itself is named after the person who is supposed to have invented heroin – Dr. Alder Wright.

The trophy is becoming well known in Dutch drug services, and the winner often takes advantage of the trophy by seeking extra publicity (and money) for their award winning initiative.

This year, the prize went to the town of Alkmaar – to Tilly Balk and her project called” Vrouwen Solidair”.

Tilly, (who is known as Aunt Tilly in Alkmaar), has been working with marginalized groups in her local area since 1981, and all on a voluntarily basis.

Her activities come right from the heart, and Tilly and her colleagues have helped many people with basic needs and more.

Tilly herself said that she does not do anything special – she is just being human.

She was in tears when she received the trophy.

The Party

After a meal of Chinese/Indonesian food the Dow Jones Band went on stage and played like animals.

Two members of the band are police officers working at Amsterdam’s Warmoesstraat police station, (the most infamous police station that we have in the Netherlands).

The band played until ten, and by that that the majority of visitors already had left.

Although we live in a small country, it can still take several hours for some to get home.

Follow up programme

Following the drug user day, a number of people took advantage of their stay in Holland to see some of the interesting initiatives currently underway in the Netherlands.

Den Haag
Stichting Drugpunt Den Haag is a user group that has managed to get substantial funding from their local authority, which has made it possible to pay the workers for their work.

Our delegates from Spain, UK, France and Slovenia met with representatives of the local authorities who work with Drugpunt, and this turned out to be a very interesting meeting, which talked about mutual collaboration, and the influence Drugpunt has had on local politics.

Rotterdam

The Spanish and Russians also went to Rotterdam, where, of course, they visited St. Pauls Church. In this church there are safe rooms, and many marginalized people practically live there.

Also delegates visited the ‘Basements’ mentioned above, but it is hard to give an impression of these places, as they are very unique.

The day closed with a dinner, which was paid for by the dealer of the Basements!

Zwolle

The Spanish delegates clearly couldn’t get enough of our country – so they also went to Zwolle and visited a service centre for drug users, and afterwards went to a tourist site called Giethoorn.

Conclusive remarks

The first International Drug Users Day 1999 turned out to be very successful.

A lot of information was shared between the various user groups, and many groups made commitments to keep in contact with each other.

Fortunately, most groups now have access to Internet, which makes collaboration easier than ever before.

And, if the funding can be found, it is clear that many delegates would like to meet again at the upcoming Harm reduction Conference in Jersey in April 2000.

Theo van Dam
Daan van der Gouwe
December 1999

(with many thanks to Bill Nelles who made the report readable in English)

AGING DUTCH JUNKIES GO TO SPECIAL HOME

Media Awareness ProjectCalgary Herald (CN AB)

Pub date:Sat, 29 Jan 2000

Author Christine Lucassen – Reuters Rotterdam

 

AGING DUTCH JUNKIES GO TO SPECIAL HOME

`Look at this bathroom – it’s fantastic!There’s even a special low seat in the shower for when I grow really old,’ Carmel exclaimed before turning toward the window to prepare her heroin.

Carmel, silver-haired and fragile at 53, took her first pills and amphetamines at 17.

She became gradually trapped in the drugs spiral and began a life on the streets that lasted for years.

Now she sits on a neatly made single bed and injects her drugs while talking of her past, a handful of postcards of chubby angels and flowers pinned on the wall above her head.

She is one of seven residents in Rotterdam’s first home for elderly drug addicts, which opened its doors in the Dutch port city in September.

Known for tolerance of drug use, the liberal Netherlands faces a new hurdle as an increasing number of hard drug addicts survive to a pension able age.

While selling hard drugs such as heroin and cocaine is unlawful and dealers are prosecuted, addicts are treated as patients with a chronic health problem.

Hard drugs users are growing older, and their habit takes its toll.

They often face in their 40s the same problems people normally experience only in their early 70s.

`They are forgetful, neglect themselves, suffer from insomnia, live in isolation.

They need a place where they can settle down and take their drugs quietly,’ said Trudy de Bruin, administrator of the Boumanhuis home for elderly addicts.

Their health improves and their use of drugs stabilizes when they no longer need to go to the street for a fix,” de Bruin said.

The home is officially approved and partly funded by the Rotterdam municipality and health authority.

Residents, whose average age is 53, receive medical care and a daily dose of the heroin substitute methadone.

Screened for good behaviour before being admitted, they are not pressured to kick their habit.

Drug use is accepted – the staff even provide drugs on request – although house rules stipulate it is allowed only in private rooms.

`We concluded a few years ago that drying out isn’t always the best solution.

Drug use has been part of these people’s lives for 20-25 years and they don’t harm anybody,’ De Bruin said.

Tenants pay rent and, if they want drugs, they have to pay for them.

If they need more money than they do temporary work, mostly cleaning.

In the home, they do the shopping, cleaning and cooking.

Counsellors are on call to provide help and advice.

Senior junkies opt to live in the Boumanhuis so they no longer have to cope alone in the outside world.

They value the presence of a social worker 24 hours a day.

Security and the possibility to use drugs without being persecuted is also crucial.

`My life used to be like a roller-coaster. In here I’m doing better.

I’m no longer alone, there’s always somebody around and knowing that really helps,’ said Carmel.

Life in the home appears calm and quiet, with tenants back in their rooms in the evening long before the 11 p.m. deadline.

`In the house we lead quiet, ordinary lives, verging on boring sometimes.

People often just want to sit in their room, watch television, read a newspaper….

They discover it’s cozy to have a home,’ de Bruin explained.

In her room, Carmel, who spends most of her days reading, watching TV, drawing, writing or knitting, proudly shows off a turquoise dress she has made.

`I need to go on for a few more inches. It should not be too revealing: there are five men in the house,’ she said, smiling.

A man cleans the sink of the already spotless kitchen while team leader Roy talks to another addict and grey-haired Fred, 49, plays computer games.

`The Boumanhuis saved my life,’ Carmel observes.

MAP posted-by: Doc-Hawk

Selling Out First Amendment Rights

Media Awareness ProjectHouston Chronicle (TX) Pub date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000

 

Author: Charles Krauthammer Note: Krauthammer is a Pulitzer Prize-winning syndicated columnist based in Washington, D.C. Also: MAP is trying to identify as many newspapers as possible that this column appeared in. Readers, even if you are not sure how to newshawk the column, but you know it appeared in your newspaper, we would appreciate a note with the newspaper name, pubdate and title for the column. So far, besides this newspaper, we know it appeared in The Washington Post, Everett Herald (WA), Seattle Times (WA). Please send your notes to rlake@mapinc.org SELLING OUT FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTSNO one invokes the sanctity of the First Amendment more often and more passionately than the media. When music companies are criticized for purveying the most repulsive misogynistic rap lyrics, they hoist the First Amendment flag.

When newspaper reporters who’ve given confidentiality pledges refuse to testify about their sources, the flag is run up again.

As it should be. For all its abuses, the First Amendment is perhaps the greatest of all bulwarks against the power of government.

It turns out, however, that the TV networks are not quite the First Amendment purists they pretend to be.

Dangle some cash in front of them and they will let the White House drug czar vet their scripts.

Salon magazine reported Jan. 13 that in return for being released from the obligation to show free anti-drug ads (and thus enabled to sell that ad time), the TV networks have allowed the White House to review prime time programs to make sure they send the right anti-drug message.

These networks are parts of some of the same media giants that make passionate protestations of their sovereign right to purvey syncopated CD incitement to rape and murder.

They are quite willing, however, to accept government meddling in their prime time shows if that makes them money.

How much money?

There’s the howler.

The six networks combined sold their First Amendment soul for a grand total of $25 million.

This for companies with combined revenues of about $5 billion.

In reality, this ad-money-for-script-vetting swap is a novel form of product placement.

Product placement is the practice of taking a bundle of cash from Coke in return for having the hero swig some prominently onscreen.

Disturbing as it is, gratuitously inserting a soda can or cereal box into a scene for money is a trivial form of artistic corruption. However, inserting government-sponsored messages is not.

Unlike Coke and Kellogg, government has the power to tax, audit, subpoena, imprison. We allow companies and individuals and groups to put all kinds of pressure on media — through advertising, boycotts, lobbying.

But we balk when government, with such unique and abusable power, steps in.

In a system where liberty is preserved by the separation and diffusion of power, we rightly refuse to grant government even more power through control of the content of free media.

One reason is to prevent slightly Orwellian press releases of the kind issued by the White House drug office on Jan. 14. It is headlined “New Study Finds Little Depiction of Illicit Drugs on Network Prime Time Television: White House Drug Czar Pleased with Accurate Portrayals.” He should be. He paid for it.

No big deal, you say. This whole affair involves nothing more than promoting anti-drug messages on prime time shows. What’s so wrong with that?

The big deal is not these particular ads, but the principle: government’s hand in mass media scriptwriting.

If that is no big deal, what is to prevent government from doing it for other causes of its choosing?

President Clinton and his spokesmen were asked whether the vetting of scripts might not be extended to equally worthy messages about “gun control” and “youth violence” (and why not to recycling, ethnic tolerance, charitable giving and the correct use of the fork?). The response was not encouraging.

Press Secretary Joe Lockhart was defiant. We were “looking for other ways to get the (anti-drug) message out that allows networks in a robust advertising environment to sell to other people where they can make more money,” he said.

Got a problem with that? Well, yes. Some find the practice corrupting. And when they asked Lockhart if it does not raise questions about deceptive government influence, he responded in perfect Clintonian fashion: “As far as sort of theological questions for the entertainment industry,” said Lockhart, “I suggest you put the questions to the entertainment industry.”

But of course. This is surely an airy abstraction for the likes of Thomas Aquinas, on retainer at DreamWorks.

MAP posted-by: Richard Lake

Desperate Addicts Inject Others’ Blood

July 12, 2010

The New York Times

By DONALD G. McNEIL Jr.

Desperate heroin users in a few African cities have begun engaging in a practice that is so dangerous it is almost unthinkable: they deliberately inject themselves with another addict’s blood, researchers say, in an effort to share the high or stave off the pangs of withdrawal.

The practice, called flashblood or sometimes flushblood, is not common, but has been reported in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, on the island of Zanzibar and in Mombasa, Kenya.

It puts users at the highest possible risk of contracting AIDS and hepatitis. While most AIDS transmission in Africa is by heterosexual sex, the use of heroin is growing in some cities, and experts are warning that flashblood — along with syringe-sharing and other dangerous habits — could fuel a new wave of AIDS infections.

“Injecting yourself with fresh blood is a crazy practice — it’s the most effective way of infecting yourself with H.I.V.,” said Dr. Nora D. Volkow, director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, which supports the researchers who discovered the practice. “Even though the number who do it is a relatively small group, they are vectors for H.I.V. because they support themselves by sex work.”

Sheryl A. McCurdy, a professor of public health at the University of Texas in Houston, first described the practice five years ago in a brief letter to The British Medical Journal and recently published a study of it in the journal Addiction.

“I don’t really know how widespread it is,” said Dr. McCurdy who is contacting other researchers working with addicts to get them to survey their subjects about it. “There’s pretty circular movement in East Africa, so I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s in other cities.”

Increasing use of heroin in parts of Africa has the potential to magnify the AIDS epidemic.

In most East African countries like Tanzania and Kenya, only 3 to 8 percent of adults are infected with the AIDS virus, far fewer than in southern Africa, where the rates reach 15 to 25 percent.

But among those who inject heroin, the rates are far higher. In Tanzania, about 42 percent of addicts are infected. The rate is even higher — 64 percent — among female addicts, Dr. McCurdy said, and since most support themselves through prostitution, they are in two high-risk groups, and their customers are at risk of catching the disease.

Most of the addicts she has interviewed who practice flashblood, Dr. McCurdy said, are women. For them, sharing blood is more of an act of kindness than an attempt to get high: a woman who has made enough money to buy a sachet of heroin will share blood to help a friend avoid withdrawal. The friend is often a fellow sex worker who has become too old or sick to find customers.

By contrast, on Zanzibar, it is mostly among men, according to a 2006 study in The African Journal of Drug and Alcohol Studies, which found that about 9 percent of the 200 drug-injectors interviewed practiced it.

There have also been reports in East African newspapers of addicts selling their blood, but those have not been confirmed by medical researchers.

And, there have been scattered reports of flashblood-type practices in other countries with large numbers of heroin addicts, including Pakistan, but they also have not been confirmed by researchers.

Whether or not someone can actually a get drug rush from such a relatively tiny amount of blood has never been tested, Dr. McCurdy said. Humans have about five quarts of blood and the flashblood-user injects less than a teaspoon.

“They say they do,” she said. “They pass out as if they just got a high. But I’ve talked to doctors who say that could be entirely the placebo effect.”

One possibility, she said, is that traces of the drug are still in the syringe. After piercing a vein, an addict will typically draw some blood into the syringe, push it back out and repeat that three or four times to make sure all the heroin has been flushed into their blood. Those offering flashblood will usually hand over the syringe after only one in-out cycle.

The heroin sold in East Africa, she added, is often quite strong because it has come from relatively pure shipments on their way to Europe from Afghanistan or Asia.

Until recently, heroin use was uncommon on the continent because most Africans are too poor for traffickers to bother with. But in the last decade, smugglers have begun using port cities like Dar es Salaam and Mombasa and airport cities like Nairobi and Johannesburg as way stations on their routes: law-enforcement officials can often be bribed, and couriers from countries with no history of drug smuggling may escape searches by European border officers. The couriers may be paid in drugs, which they resell.

With more local users, more heroin is being sold in Africa. In the last decade, law-enforcement and drug treatment agencies said, heroin use has increased, especially in Kenya and Tanzania, South Africa and Nigeria. Brown heroin that must be heated and inhaled — “chasing the dragon” — has given way to water-soluble white heroin that can be injected. Prices have fallen by as much as 90 percent.

While a teaspoon of blood is more than enough to transfer diseases like AIDS, said Dr. James AuBuchon, president-elect of the American Association of Blood Banks, it would not be enough to cause a life-threatening immune reaction, as can ensue when a patient gets a transfusion from someone of the wrong blood type. Instead, “you’d likely get only brief symptoms,” he said.

Dr. AuBuchon, who practices in Seattle, said he had never heard of flashblood, but added that he was horrified by the idea.

“What,” he asked, “are they thinking?”